Custody/Access Dispute
and Choice of Lawyers
It is easy to ratchet up the
conflict between separated parents: Send them to litigious lawyers
who will tell each respective parent they can win his or her
position. Then for added measure, have each lawyer advise their
respective parent to obtain as much information as possible that
will reflect poorly on the other while at the same time documenting
as much positive information about oneself. Put all this information
into writing and conclude with a statement indicating how all the
aforementioned supports his or her own position otherwise known as,
“the children are better off with me and the other parent should be
stripped of parental rights”. In short order you will have two very
disgruntled parents who hate each other with children stuck in the
middle, looking shell-shocked from the parental conflict.
To make matters worse, rather
than seeing the above dynamic as the source of increased conflict,
have the lawyers step back in favour of each parent documenting the
other’s moves and behaviours so that they can be negatively
interpreted and held against them. In little time, the parental
conflict will have taken on a life of its own to which an assessor
can then be introduced. Whichever lawyer is most dissatisfied with
the outcome of the assessment can then initiate an attack on the
assessor to undermine the assessor’s credibility with the courts. So
rather than ever settling, the nature, depth and breadth of the
attack can escalate, keeping a resolution at bay seemingly forever.
The children get to languish indefinitely, often deteriorating
themselves, socially academically and behaviourally. But that can
always be blamed on the other parent!
Alternately, conflict between
separated parents can be managed in favour of achieving a negotiated
settlement. Rather than a litigious disposition where the lawyers
encourage undermining the integrity and position of the other
parent, they can work towards identifying issues and developing
solutions to maintain or improve relationships and parental
functioning. In the long run, they can help their respective client
appreciate how two well-intentioned and healthy parents can better
provide for the long-term interests and needs of their children.
They needn’t shy away from contentious issues, but address them not
with the intention of limiting parental involvement or authority,
but with the intention of improving parental well-being and hence
care and well-being of the children.
As the lawyers reach impasses,
they can bring in a social worker or other support, not with a view
to determining illness, but with the view of facilitating education
on matters related to the well-being of children between separated
parents. If mental health issues are apparent, referral to treatment
facilities or agencies can be facilitated. The social worker can
also meet with the children to ascertain their concerns and
facilitate their adjustment to the parental separation. Throughout,
the social worker can also help parents make much needed adjustments
to their new circumstance. In the end, children can feel supported
by both parents who may be apt to act more reasonably and supportive
of each other and hence minimize concern or anxiety on the part of
the children. They in turn will be better able to concentrate and
manage their tasks, such as school.
While presented above as one
way or the other, it is clear that some custody and access disputes
intensify over time whereas others settle more easily.
The eye on the prize is the
well-being of the children. While some parents’ behaviour or bona
fide problems are of concern, many can be dealt with in ways that
can lead to healthier conclusions. Parents are advised to be
cautious that the legal process isn’t the toxic event intensifying
problems. Choose your lawyer wisely and choose how it goes.