Imagine… A Collaborative
Approach To Divorce
There is a movement in family
law whereby divorcing couples can sign agreements with lawyers to
not go to court. More specifically, the process is known as
Collaborative Family Law (CFL) and the agreement to not go to court
is binding upon the lawyers, not the couple. If one or both clients
are unsatisfied, either may still march the dispute to court. They
will however have to find new lawyers.
At heart, the CFL process
seeks to develop consensus between the parties for a mutually
acceptable settlement. The settlement can include the division of
assets, spousal or child support and/or the ongoing care of
children.
In traditional dispute
scenarios both parties retain their own financial advisor and may be
subject to a custody/access assessment. The results from financial
planners may vary and in such cases, the dispute then widens to
include the experts. The recommendations of the assessor may not
reflect the position of either or both parties and hence their
involvement may fall to conflict as well. Often, other third parties
are drawn into the dispute as well.
In the CFL process, while the
couple retains separate collaboratively trained lawyers, they then
retain a single financial advisor and/or child expert and/or divorce
coaches who form a team with the lawyers and clients. The financial
advisor, child expert and divorce coaches act as consultants within
a team framework. Because each party has their own lawyer though,
they are assured their respective legal rights are preserved.
Certainly the disposition of the lawyers is one of settlement as
litigation is openly off the table. The risk of conflict is reduced
in favour of improving the probability of settlement.
At issue to some persons
considering CFL, is concern that they may be forced to capitulate or
acquiesce on matters of importance or safety.
Firstly, no party is to be
forced to agree to anything. That is why they both retain separate
counsel; to protect legal rights and assure a process that addresses
mutual concerns.
Secondly, either party can
table contentious issues and even treatment issues. The objective is
not to capitulate, but to address all issues forthrightly and
develop plans to genuinely mitigate concerns.
The actual CFL process occurs
in four-way meetings (clients and lawyers) and can be expanded to
include the financial planner, child expert or any other consultant
for that matter. Depending on the style of CFL, ancillary experts
may automatically form part of the team. Various jurisdictions have
developed some unique differences in approach while all the while
adhering to the basic premise of reaching a settlement without the
threat of litigation.
Depending on the nature of
issues to be resolved, the number and durations of meetings can
vary. Unlike traditional family law where meetings tend to be
conducted on a schedule determined by Court process, CFL meetings
are independent of Court and hence at the control of the
participants. Further, because matters are never left to the
discretion of a Judge, the parties retain full responsibility and
control for settlements achieved.
Practitioners of CFL offer it
as a more respectful way to resolve family disputes as neither side
is bent on tearing down the other, but conversely, directed towards
leaving relationships as intact as possible. Because collaborate
doesn’t mean capitulate, issues can be addressed in a manner that
maintains control in the hands of the parties. The process is
thought to provide for more durable outcomes whilst maintaining the
integrity of the participants. This bodes well for the children and
transition to new family structures.
Separating or divorcing?
Consider Collaborative Family Law for a non-litigious, more
respectful solution. Google; Collaborative Family Law.