Let Go To
Win
Monkey
hunters have an ingenious way to trap their prey. They carve a small
hole into a gourd and then hollow it out. Into the gourd they place
a small piece of fruit or some nuts. They strap the gourd to a tree
and then wait. In a little while a monkey shows up and sniffs at the
bait. The monkey then squeezes its hand into the gourd and grasps
the bait. With its hand clasping the bait in a fist, it cannot
remove its hand from the gourd. Trapped. Along come the hunter and
cuts off the monkey’s head.
Parents in
custody or access disputes are advised to remember that story. It is
true and reflects what can happen when parents engage in battle over
the kids.
As each
parent grabs hold of their prized position, both can lose control of
their destiny to the will of the Courts and the influence of the
assessor. Not only can both parents lose control of the outcome, but
when children become the battlefield, they then often become the
casualties too. Children subject to bitter and ongoing parenting
disputes are at risk of anxiety, depression, school failure, poor
self-esteem and behavioural problems. Many of these problems can
persist through childhood and into adulthood thus affecting adult
relationship and vocational performance. This is quite the legacy of
parents unwilling ease their position.
Parents in
bitter custody or access disputes should consider that the prize is
not necessarily half the time with their kids or even half a say in
matters affecting their lives. The true prize is a 100% relationship
with one’s children. This is achieved not by fighting tooth and nail
for one’s perceived rights, as the right to fight is not necessarily
what is right for the child. Rather, parents are advised to
concentrate on their relationship with their kids.
A parent
can win a disproportionate amount of time with their child, but if
the relationship is poor, it really just means more time to ruin the
relationship and hurt the child. Further, not enough time with the
other parent may only create resentment towards the parent who
limited the child’s time. Rather than focusing on amount of time
then, parents can strategize how they will spend the time they have.
Thus when concentrating on quality of time, parents can direct their
attention to taking their kids to extra-curricular activities,
helping with homework, joining in with hobbies and volunteering on
school outings. Therefore parents can negotiate the activities in
which they participate with their children instead of the amount of
time a child is necessarily in their care. Further and even if not a
custodial parent, parents can still negotiate to attend
parent-teacher conferences and demonstrate an interest in their
child’s schooling. Thus the parent demonstrates a keen interest in
the life of their child, which enhances the relationship and
contributes to the child’s self-esteem.
Assuming
that neither parent is abusive or otherwise harmful, children tend
to develop best given enough time with both parents to have a
meaningful relationship. Meaningful though will be a function of
parental participation in the child’s life. Even if the history
suggests a parent has been distant or less available, on a go
forward basis a positive outcome to a failed marriage may mean
better parental relationships with the children. Limiting the
possibility of better parental relationships does a double
disservice to the child. Not only will the child have lost the
primary family structure, but also the possibility of these better
parental relationships.
Hence,
parents on both sides of the battle are advised to stop and think
before clenching tight on their position. Both can let go a little
to gain a lot.
Interestingly enough, monkeys who do let go their fruit or nuts get
to live another day and parents who let go a little, often improve
relationships.